![]() Rewriting history of shared repositories and branches is something you should NEVER do. Note: You should do this only when working with your own fork. Personally I prefer to keep the history as clean as possible and go for option three, but different teams have different workflows. You have a few options: git push -f origin feature-x Git checkout -b feature-x #some work and some commits happen #some time passes git fetch upstream git rebase upstream/main Publish with git forkĪfter the above steps, publish your work in your remote fork with a simple push: git push origin feature-xĪ slight problem arises if you have to update your remote branch feature-x after you've published it, because of some feedback from the upstream maintainers. In a standard setup, you generally have an origin and an upstream remote - the latter being the gatekeeper of the project or the source of truth to which you wish to contribute.įirst, verify that you have already setup a remote for the upstream repository, and hopefully an origin too: Let me start by detailing a common setup and the most basic workflow to interact with upstream repositories. Git upstream: Keep up-to-date and contribute In this blog, I’ll introduce you to the basics, the gotchas, and even leave you with a cool tip to get you ahead of the curve. ![]() ![]() To make sure all contributors are drawing from the same place, you’ll need to know some principles of how git forking interacts with git upstream. But if you’re not sending those changes back upstream-which means sending it back to the parent repository-you’re at risk for losing track of them, which can cause divergent lines in your repository. Forking projects to make your own changes lets you easily integrate your own contributions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |